Thoughts on the Concept of Originality

I attended the PSU Bookstore Book Signing today for the book Searching for Fire. I am very grateful for all the hard work that was put into organizing the event. I had some great conversations today and one with a mechanical engineering student which left me pondering something philosophical. He asked, “How do you create a work that is original?”

I understand this perspective. As an avid Netflix fan, I am often going through trailer after trailer after trailer of shows that sometimes seem to have similar story lines or characters and ideas. It seems so repetitive, even tiring. Sometimes I wonder if originality in art is dying. All that has been done will be done again and it repeats over and over and over again. Sometimes I feel jaded and I think this seems meaningless or pointless. Sometimes I think maybe we should give up and not produce anymore art. It’s all been done or copyrighted. There’s nothing left to do or create or invent…..meaninglessness.

But then, I think of a world without art – without stories, without songs, without poems, without movies, without the very things that lift us up and entertain us and give us hope and make us think and feel deeply.

And I ask myself…..how does one become a true originator of art in this civilized world?

Originality of thinking – When one ponders these words, perhaps they consider an inventor such as Thomas Edison. 

Edison was born in the Midwest and did not attend much school.  There is a story on Facebook of a letter written to his mother when he was a child. 

Edison went on in life to invent many great things like the first industrial laboratory at Menlo Park, phenol chemical plants where he also produced other chemical products such as benzene, aniline dyes, xylene, shellac, pyrax, and salicylic acid used in making aspirin.  Using the Edison Ore Mining Company, he discovered ways to make cement.  Edison held the patent also for the first moving picture camera called a kinetoscope.  Edison owned a film studio that made over 1,000 short films.  Edison invented the stock ticker broadcast system and the two-way telegraph.  Many of his inventions were fundamental to the development of infrared and x ray technology as well.  His most famous inventions were probably the phonograph and his work in the field of electric light. 

Edison had many interesting notions on life including the idea that Nature is the Supreme Intelligence rather than a theological God. Edison also viewed this Nature as neither merciful, loving, nor kind but rather malevolent. Edison was a vegetarian as well due to his beliefs about “do the least harm to others.” Edison also believed that the United States needed monetary reform and he argued against the Gold Standard, debt-based money, and the Federal Reserve System.

Where did Edison get all these ideas? He is considered an original thinker, a pioneer of new ideas. I think the answer lies in this equation:

Education + Imagination = Originality

Edison was largely self-educated and spent all his time on jobs and at home reading science books, any books he could get his hands on. In fact, he got fired from a few jobs due to his over-focus on science and conducting experiments while at work.

The point is Edison is considered an original thinker but what he was doing, is what is mentioned in these quotes here:

All society, all thought, all idea…….everything civilized, every civilization is built on past constructions. There is no originality, in and of itself, without first knowledge of what has come before. And this continued progression of construction mixed with our own imagination based on our own life experience and knowledge is crucial in opposition to wild Nature which seeks to decompose the constructions of mankind.

Have you ever lived in the wilderness? In the country? I have worked on a farmhouse for two years and at first romanticized communing with nature as if I was on Walden Pond with Henry David Thoreau. I thought of nature as amazing and beautiful and benevolent. But I quickly realized the same conclusion Edison did that nature can be terrifying. Nature is constantly breaking down things we build and encroaching on our tamed and controlled lands. Animals that live in nature are survival of the fittest and nature’s realities of life and death are harsh and cruel lessons. While I do enjoy nature, I understand that life in the wilderness is a harder reality than I want for myself or my children. I prefer the companionship and security of human community.

The author of Ecclesiastes speaks of the opposition between man and nature when he says,

The quote speaks of wind. Wind is nature’s master of erosion, of decomposition. Wind is featured in the poem Ozymandias:

So, in conclusion, I think art is very important to this world. Art is a creation and with its presence more art grows and expands out into the world. Just like friendship, love, compassion…..these are man-made creations and as we work towards them, they expand infinitely in the face of Nature’s cruel decomposition. These types of human connection are essential to life and the advancement of civilization…..of peace, prosperity, and security for more and more humans.

So writers, painters, poets, sculptors…….roll up your sleeves and get to work. Don’t ponder whether your work is original enough. Ponder how you can create or build more human connection.

2 thoughts on “Thoughts on the Concept of Originality

  1. Right. I’m in total agreement here. Originality comes from learning from the past and adding to it. The Bruce Lee quote nails it. I don’t know if you are aware of this, but in contemporary art and theory, originality and authenticity are thought to be myths. This is why so many artists, like Jeff Koons, do “appropriation”, which is to take something from pop culture, or everyday life, make a copy of it, and put it in the gallery. This behind much of Warhol’s work as well. You could say contemporary art as a whole is dedicated to the idea that originality is impossible and authenticity is a myth. This is why people love the quote, “Great artists steal”. It’s all BS, which I take apart in loving detail in serval articles, but my conclusion is the same as yours. We are always capable of originality, but it takes hard work. You have to get to where people left off, and then through imagination, perseverence, and experimentation, go a little further.

    Like

    1. Thank you for your comments. There’s so much to learn from other bloggers here. I will check out your articles. There’s something I was trying to get at and express in this article that I’ve thought a lot about since moving out to the country and noticing almost the fragility of the premise of civilization and yet the way humanity continues to build and invent and sustain, growing and nurturing ideas and thoughts and institutions and relationships for the next generations in the face of adversity. I hope that contemporary art and theory will promote expansion of creative endeavors rather than stifle it with limiting jargon that diminishes value or worth of a person’s creative contributions. That behavior on large scale causes societal retraction rather than growth. I think it has a lot to do with that little article I wrote on David McClelland and the positive impact on societal growth through focusing stories on achievement for younger generations. Thanks again.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s